|
|
Sustainability report
Managing our environment responsibly
Environmental management and resource conservation
The responsibility for environmental management within Transnet rests with the respective
operating divisions and specialist units. During the year under review the Company
intensified the drive to ensure a common understanding of current environmental issues
impacting on the Company. This included the introduction of an integrated approach to
handling environmental matters as well as a more coordinated effort in rolling out
environmental initiatives across the Company. Reporting on various environmental
indicators, including operational incidents, has been standardised and will be further
streamlined in the year ahead.
The SHEQ forum that exists at Group level focuses predominantly on health and safety
issues, given the high priority of these issues for the Company. This decisive focus often
results in insufficient time allocated to environmental matters. In view of Transnet's
commitment to the principles outlined in the UN Global Compact and given the various
environmental challenges the Company faces, a separate Environmental Forum was
established to elevate and address environmental concerns.
Transnet upholds the principles of the UN Global Compact and applies, as best as possible,
these principles in its daily operations, management practices and infrastructure expansion
programmes. Three principles in particular relate to environmental management and pertain
to the Company's responsibility to protect, manage and rehabilitate the environment within
which it operates. These include:
- Supporting a precautionary approach to environmental challenges;
- Undertaking initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility; and
- Encouraging the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.
|
| Managing our environment responsibly |
|
|
|
| Environmental management and
resource conservation |
|
 |
 |
| Environmental performance |
|
|
 |
Challenges and progress made
Environmental risk constitutes one of Transnet’s top ten risks and receives priority oversight
from the Transnet Board of Directors as well as the Transnet Group Executive Committee.
The management of environmental risks has improved over the past year as action plans and
control mechanisms are now monitored on a monthly basis. Environmental risks featuring
prominently in the review period include the risk of legislative non-compliance relating to
pollution and contamination; the risk of not obtaining authorisation for new projects due to
environmental factors; and possible infrastructure failures, such as the pipeline network
impacting negatively on surrounding ecological areas.
In 2007, Transnet's operating divisions rated the National Environment Management Act No.
107 of 1998 (NEMA) as the Company's second highest regulatory risk. In response to this
rating, Transnet Group Compliance initiated the National Environment Management (NEM)
project to include all environmental regulatory requirements applicable to Transnet's
operations. In 2008, operating divisions rated NEMA as the highest regulatory risk for
Transnet, thereby reaffirming the importance of the NEM project. Transnet Group Compliance
has initiated a project to enable Group-wide compliance with the environmental legislation.
The adverse impact of environmental incidents on the Company's reputation remains a
challenge. In the year ahead, the Transnet Environmental Forum will enhance cooperation
between the operating divisions and the specialist units and ensure that a set of common
reporting procedures are developed and maintained to address the aforementioned risks.
Transnet Group Risk Management has initiated standardised reporting on environmental
incidents, as well as reporting on environmental indicators relating to resource
conservation, such as water and energy usage. Incident reporting will be further improved
in the year ahead. The CURA risk management system will be optimised and the Transnet
Occurrence Management System (TOMS) - a SAP based environment, health and safety
(EHS) module - will be further refined to support the standardisation and streamlining of
Group-wide risk reporting.
| Material environmental risks |
| |
Operating division |
|
Nature of environmental risk/incident |
|
Regulatory requirement impacted |
|
Action |
| |
Freight Rail; |
|
– |
Exposure to |
|
Section 20 of the |
|
Asbestos risk assessments. |
| |
Transnet Property; |
|
|
asbestos fibres. |
|
Environment |
|
|
| |
National Ports |
|
|
|
|
Conservation Act |
|
Rehabilitation and restoration of |
| |
Authority; and Rail |
|
– |
Contamination |
|
No. 73 of 1989 as |
|
contaminated sites. |
| |
Engineering |
|
|
caused by |
|
amended. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
historic spillage |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
of asbestos. |
|
National |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Management Act No. 70 of 1998 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
National |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Management Waste Act No. 59 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
of 2008. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Occupational Health and Safety Act No. 85 of |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1993. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Regulations of 2001. |
|
|
| |
Port Terminals |
Manganese |
|
Air Quality Act No. |
|
Dust monitoring stations |
| |
|
pollution |
|
39 of 2004. |
|
established. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Dust reduction programme initiated. |
| |
National Ports |
Dom Pedro oil |
|
National |
|
Preliminary investigation |
| |
Authority |
contamination of |
|
Environmental |
|
conducted. |
| |
|
water and soil (PE). |
|
Management Act |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
No. 107 of 1998. |
|
Responsible tenant requested to |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
clean up soil contamination and to |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
investigate the source of such |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
contamination. |
Emission management
As part of Transnet’s quest for “zero harm”, dust and gas emissions monitoring was
intensified during the year. Taking into consideration the Air Quality Act No. 39 of 2004,
concerted effort is being made to monitor inadvertent dust fall out. Strategic points were
identified throughout the operations and monitoring instruments were commissioned. The
measurement of gas emissions will form part of the carbon footprint study which is
planned for the next year.
Waste management
Transnet’s operations inevitably generate various types of waste, which is separated,
recycled or disposed of through carefully selected service providers. The removal of
asbestos received priority during the year and, going forward, Transnet will pursue best
practices in the handling (including the separation and recording of the amount of waste
generated), storage, removal and disposal of the various waste types.
Reality story
Long-term environmental
damage curbed
The deteriorating health of marine ecosystems
and the high prevalence of marine
water pollution are ongoing concerns for
the National Ports Authority. Various portassociated
activities contribute to high
levels of pollution, such as the spread of
sediment contaminants with dredge spoil
and the introduction of invasive or alien
organisms through the release of ballast
water and hull fouling.
The National Ports Authority is committed to
the ongoing prevention of pollution, in line
with international leading practices. Several
preventative mechanisms have been
introduced, including the bi-annual
monitoring of water quality at its ports,
focused internal and external forums to
discuss and monitor environmental
challenges, and where possible, working with
external stakeholders to minimise
environmental damage. The National Ports
Authority has approached the Department of
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, to help
curb high levels of marine pollution
originating from land-based sources as well
as storm-water outlets and rivers flowing
into the ports.
The South African Environmental
Observation Network (SAEON) Coastal
and Inshore Node, which monitors
long-term environmental change along the
South African coast, was appointed in
2007 to implement a long-term,
standardised monitoring programme for
the ports of Richards Bay, Durban, East
London, Ngqura, Port Elizabeth, Mossel
Bay and Cape Town. The programme is
designed to provide a comprehensive and
integrated assessment of the ecological
quality of each port.
As the marine environment's natural
variability makes short-term trend
analysis difficult, several years of
monitoring is required to enable reliable
assessments and to implement
appropriate management interventions.
The long-term observation programme
incorporates the most critical physical,
chemical and biological parameters from
both a management and scientific
perspective, and draws on sampling sites
within each harbour. Whilst conclusive
results will only emerge in time, varying
degrees of marine damage and water
pollution have already been observed at
the following ports: metal contamination in
sediments in Cape Town; blood-water
discharge in Mossel Bay; and water quality
issues resulting from the catchments in
East London, Durban and Richards Bay.
Going forward, the National Ports Authority
will monitor marine water quality at all of
its ports and will continue to work with port
stakeholders to uphold the highest
standards of marine ecology management. |
The carbon challenge
The Department of Water and Environmental Affairs initiated a long-term mitigation
scenario (LTMS) planning programme in collaboration with other departments and sector
roleplayers, to gauge the impact of different greenhouse gas emission scenarios on the
environment. The scenario planning model will assist Government to determine appropriate
policy directions to address issues relating to energy efficiency; electricity generation;
carbon capture and storage; as well as issues specific to the transport industry. The South
African Cabinet accepted these policy directions in 2008, and has initiated a policy
development process to draft a National Climate Change Response Policy for publication by
the end of 2010.
With the transport industry being one of the fastest growing sectors world-wide, Transnet's
role as a freight logistics provider in the transport logistics chain renders it a major
contributor to the cumulative transportation carbon footprint locally, regionally and globally.
Port Terminals, for instance, operates 15 terminals in 6 of South Africa's ports. An operation
of this magnitude consumes large volumes of electricity, water and fossil fuels. The vast
machinery base required for the cargo movement further emphasises the impact that Port
Terminals may have on Transnet's overall carbon footprint.
Despite the negative impact of climate change, there are also opportunities for Transnet to
transform its operations positively by innovating around areas of cost savings, resource
optimisation and good corporate citizenship. Transnet's proactive response to climate
change is evident in its divisional initiatives to curb the Company's national carbon footprint
and to preserve natural resources, as outlined below.
Environmental performance
Following the commitment made in last year’s Annual Report, and in response to the
recommendations made by the Transnet Environmental Forum, a baseline resource utilisation
pilot study of water, electricity and fuel was initiated during the year.
The objective of this baseline report is to:
- Assess the value of energy, water and fuel utilised by Rail Engineering and Port Terminals;
- Provide a comparison of the utilisation of fuel for 2008 and 2009;
- Evaluate the usage for 2009 and develop an expectation for usage during the next
year; and
- Develop a strategy to closely monitor the utilisation of these critical resources and the
need to reduce utilisation where possible.
Fuel consumption
Transnet experienced an overall decrease in fuel utilisation of 9,4% compared to 2008.
Freight Rail consumes the majority of Transnet’s total fuel utilisation, making up 71,3% of
the total fuel usage. This utilisation is in line with expectations as Freight Rail is the largest
operating division within the Company, responsible for transportation of commodities and
containers.
Port Terminals, responsible for cargo services within the Company, consumes 6,4% of
Transnet’s total fuel utilisation. The division previously utilised approximately 6,2% of the
total fuel utilisation. Therefore, utilisation is in line with the previous year’s utilisation and
expectations for the Company.
The specialist units utilised 21,9% of Transnet’s total fuel. There has been a slight
decrease in the overall utilisation from the prior year, as freightdynamics, was sold at the
end of the 2008 financial year. It is expected that the utilisation of other operating
divisions will decrease in the next financial year, following the disposal of the Autopax
Passenger Services (Pty) Ltd.
 |
2008, p76 |
|
The Company is committed to exploring
cleaner technologies and renewable
energy resources to sustain business in
the current environmental context.
Transnet will therefore continue to
participate in the Government’s long-term
mitigation scenario planning process. |
| |
A baseline resource utilisation pilot
study of water, electricity and fuel during
the year. While the scope of the pilot
study covers all operating divisions’ fuel
consumption for 2008 and 2009, it only
focused on Port Terminals and Rail
Engineering for water and electricity
consumption for 2009. The objective of
this baseline report was to:
- Assess the value of energy, water
and fuel utilised by Rail Engineering
and Port Terminals;
- Provide a comparison of the
utilisation of fuel for 2008 and 2009;
- Evaluate the usage for 2009 and
develop an expectation for usage
during the next year; and
- Develop a strategy to closely monitor
the utilisation of these critical
resources and the need to reduce
utilisation where possible.
|
| |
Introduce measures to enable Transnet to
monitor key environmental performance
indicators as outlined in the Sustainability
Value Measurement Framework.
Continue to roll out various costcontainment
and resource optimisation
initiatives which commenced in 2009, with
specific focus on stakeholder engagement
and improved communication strategies
around environmental issues.
Conduct a study that will result in an
integrated climate change strategy and
implementation plan for Transnet. The
study will have the following outcomes:
- Providing Transnet with
recommendations for monitoring and
reporting against targets and
identifying areas for further research
and innovation;
- Providing recommendations on how to
reduce the cost of doing business
whilst optimising resource usage;
- Identifying opportunities to develop
and invest in projects that generate
energy savings and carbon credits for
the Company;
- Identifying potential trade barriers for
Transnet in the context of global trade;
- Determining efficiency indicators per
operating division;
- Identify areas of vulnerability for
climate change for Transnet and
develop mitigation plans; and
- Identify opportunities for adaptation
measures and develop plans.
|
| Fuel consumption |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Movement |
| |
Operating division |
Fuel volumes
mega litre |
|
Fuel volumes
mega litre |
|
Fuel volumes
mega litre |
|
Percentage
(%) |
|
| |
Freight Rail |
172,219 |
|
188,851 |
|
(16,632) |
|
(8,8) |
|
| |
Rail Engineering |
0,212 |
|
0,234 |
|
(0,022) |
|
(9,4) |
|
| |
National Ports Authority |
0,553 |
|
0,615 |
|
(0,062) |
|
(10,0) |
|
| |
Port Terminals |
15,368 |
|
16,534 |
|
(1,166) |
|
(7,1) |
|
| |
Pipelines |
0,245 |
|
0,278 |
|
(0,033) |
|
(11,9) |
|
| |
Capital Projects |
0,152 |
|
0,173 |
|
(0,021) |
|
(12,1) |
|
| |
Specialist units |
52,831 |
|
59,816 |
|
(6,985) |
|
(11,7) |
|
| |
Total |
241,580 |
|
266,501 |
|
(24,921) |
|
(9,4) |
|
| Electricity consumption |
| |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Movement |
| |
Operating division |
Electricity consumption
KW |
|
Electricity consumption
KW |
|
Electricity consumption
KW |
|
Percentage
(%) |
|
| |
Freight Rail |
2 825 739 696 |
|
2 876 619 252 |
|
(50 879 556) |
|
(1,8) |
|
| |
Rail Engineering |
70 437 361 |
|
47 008 743 |
|
23 428 618 |
|
49,8 |
|
| |
National Ports Authority |
173 064 378 |
|
175 607 640 |
|
(2 543 262) |
|
(1,4) |
|
| |
Port Terminals |
84 912 152 |
|
81 448 760 |
|
3 463 392 |
|
4,3 |
|
| |
Pipelines |
209 433 465 |
|
204 856 616 |
|
4 576 849 |
|
2,2 |
|
| |
Capital Projects |
3 089 557 |
|
4 134 972 |
|
(1 045 415) |
|
(25,3) |
|
| |
Specialist units |
84 047 581 |
|
81 787 811 |
|
2 259 770 |
|
2,8 |
|
| |
Total |
3 450 724 190 |
|
3 471 463 794 |
|
(20 739 604) |
|
(0,6) |
|

Key stakeholders and possible impacts on stakeholders
Transnet's port, rail and pipeline operations, as well as its infrastructure expansion
programme impact on the communities where the Company operates. Key stakeholders
include communities living in areas surrounding Transnet's ports; and communities living in
close proximity to the rail and pipeline networks. Also included in Transnet's stakeholder
base are its customers and the broader public, which is served by the Company's
infrastructure.
Within the context of Transnet’s existing operations and taking into account the construction
of new infrastructure, the following social and environmental impacts have been
identified:
- Noise;
- Dust;
- Pollution and contamination;
- Waste;
- Traffic congestion; and
- Loss of animals or damage to property due to the lack of control along rail lines or as a
result of fire.
Reality story
Hydrocarbon at Dom Pedro
Quay
The National Ports Authority in Port
Elizabeth first observed hydrocarbon
seepage at Dom Pedro Quay in 2001.
Immediate corrective measures were
instituted in collaboration with the oil
industries. No further seepage was
observed until June 2008 when a
refurbishing team working on the Dom
Pedro Jetty noticed an oil substance
seeping through the seabed and under
old sand bags. As the tide rose, the
seepage appeared to stop. As part of
the initial intervention, the entire area
around the oil seepage was cordoned
off with a boom to contain the oil
spread and a non-toxic product was
used to break the oil up into a nonhazardous
form.
Although National Ports Authority was
not responsible for the oil seepage - as
evidenced by laboratory tests -
National Ports Authority management
took swift action to control the spread
of further pollution by initiating a
clean-up operation and appointing a
team of environmental specialists to
investigate the incident. An
independent consulting firm provided a
preliminary environmental report in
January 2009, including results of
forensic tests which linked the
pollutant to a nearby tank farm. As an
immediate measure, a letter of notice
was issued to the responsible oil
companies in their capacity as
'housekeepers' to implement certain
corrective measures. |
|